BLOG

Probation, the legal practice that allows an individual to remain in their community for all or part of the sentence for a criminal conviction, dates back as far as the early 19th century. Originally, the practice may have been intended to allow the court to punish an offender without punishing those who relied upon his support, or perhaps in the face of a harsh sentence to “let the punishment fit the crime.” It may be that the judges who originally meted out probation instead of prison or other harsh punishments intended to do a service to offenders and their communities. But in the 21st century, we see that probation can do more harm than good, especially when it permanently subjects poor Kansas and particularly Kansans of color to repugnant, Reconstruction era-like restrictions.  

Immediately after the Civil War ended, Southerners could no longer lawfully control the movements of Black people through the institution of slavery and turned to enacting a series of laws that are collectively referred to as Black Codes. Black Codes served to surveil formerly enslaved people’s movements, criminalize their behaviors, and of course, control their labor. Texas and Arkansas enacted laws denying Black people the right to testify against whites, serve on juries or in state militias, or vote. South Carolina made it a crime for a “person of color” to travel to and remain in the state for more than 21 days without entering a bond with two landowners to ensure his good behavior. Mississippi’s Black Code required Black men to provide written evidence of a lawful home and employment as of January 1, 1866, which, for context, was only 25 days after the 13th Amendment was ratified. Mississippi’s and other states’ “vagrancy laws” meant the failure to provide proof of acceptable employment would result in fines and newly freed Black men being “hired out” by sheriffs or courts. Mississippi also made it a crime punishable by fine and imprisonment for a Black person to act as a minister of the gospel unless they were licensed by a “regularly organized church.” Almost every state’s Black Code made it unlawful for Black people to own guns, knives or other weapons. 

Some form of the present Kansas probation statute was first enacted in 1969, but it’s unclear how long Kansas Courts have used probation as a tool. Under the current law, a judge may instruct a person on probation to avoid certain habits or behaviors and to stay away from certain places or people. A probation officer may visit a probationer’s home or any another location the officer chooses. And the individual can be ordered to maintain suitable employment, to provide volunteer labor, and to refrain from traveling without the court’s permission. If the probationer was convicted of a felony, they cannot vote for as long as they are on probation.  

It's worth noting here, that in 2022, 31% of individuals on probation were Black Americans, even though Black Americans were 14 percent of the U.S. population¹. In Kansas, we know that in 2022, 63 out of every 1000 Kansas were on probation², but we don’t know the racial breakdown of that number because Kansas, in contrast to neighboring states³, did not report it. But it is fair to surmise based upon the fact that 24% of Kansans on parole in 2022 were black⁴, that Black Kansans, who make up only 6.2% of the state’s population, are also overrepresented on the probation rolls.  

There are striking similarities between the Black Codes and the Kansas probation statute, and the percentage of Black Kansans on probation is wildly disproportionate to the total percentage of Black Kansans. Why should we be concerned? One could argue that these conditions of probation are reasonable and reasonably calculated to help an individual achieve rehabilitation. Well... maybe. Maybe being told with whom to associate and what to do with your time can help someone kick a bad habit. Perhaps being monitored and searched periodically without warning will give someone just the amount of accountability she needs to turn a corner. For some, probation conditions may prove helpful, assuming the oversight is for a reasonable time.  

But what if I told you that these conditions of probation could last forever? What if I said that an individual convicted once for a crime could be subject to visits and searches by a probation officer indefinitely, or that the government could monitor a man’s activities, community associations and employment status for the rest of his life? If I told you that an individual once convicted by a Kansas court could never start fresh in a new state or retire to a warmer climate because they are tied to the State by their probation status, or that they could never vote, would that be reasonable? Or does it sound eerily similar to that most shameful of American institutions? 

How can probation last forever? When a court orders probation, isn’t it for a few years? There is a condition of probation that I did not list earlier: in addition to any other conditions of probation, a judge shall absent circumstances the judge deems to be compelling, order a defendant to make reparation or restitution in an amount and manner determined by the court. While the order to pay restitution in itself does not make probation a lifetime sentence, another statute does. Kansas Statute section 21-6608(c)(7) states that if a defendant is ordered to pay full or partial restitution, probation may be continued for as long as the restitution ordered has not been paid. In other words, a person convicted of theft of property or services of the value of $100,000 or more who would normally be on probation for no more than three years, would be on probation for as long as she is not able to pay the restitution ordered. A person convicted of theft of property or services of the value of at least $1,500 but less than $25,000 would normally be sentenced to one year probation, but under this part of Kansas law, could be on probation for as long as she is unable to make financial restitution.  

How long does it take to pay off a $25,000 debt if you earn the minimum wage and have a felony on your record, and perhaps a family to house and feed? What if that debt is $100,000? For comparison consider this. It will take the average middle-class homeowner 30 years to pay off a $250,000 mortgage. That is, of course, if all goes well.  

Government oversight is common for people in the lowest socioeconomic class. They are more likely to have their parenting scrutinized and the intervention of child welfare services. If a low-income person requires housing assistance, state and/or federal workers will ask intrusive questions and periodically, sometimes without warning, enter their homes. They are more likely to interact with law enforcement and find themselves subject to conditions of probation that never end.  

In 2022, 12% of the Kansans lived below the poverty line. Amongst Black and Latino Kansans, 20.7% and 20.6 % respectively lived below the poverty line. For Native American Kansans that number was 17.6%. These are the individuals most in need of a government that works for them. However, due to the laws like the Kansas probation extension statute, they are most likely to remain permanently disenfranchised, unable to vote for a better tomorrow.  

It’s time to correct how our probation system and criminal legal system punish people for their poverty. We must use rigorous scrutiny to ensure that any infringements on privacy and movement imposed by probation on our fellow Kansans are truly reasonable, rather than a continuation of the legacy we claim to have left behind. 

1 Probation and Parole in the United States, 2022 | Bureau of Justice Statistics. 

2 Kansas 2022 | National Institute of Corrections.

3 In 2022, Missouri reported 18% of probationers were Black, Oklahoma reported that 19% of probationers were black, and Colorado reported that just under 10% of probationers were black.  

4 Probation and Parole in the United States, 2022. 

Date

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Show list numbers

Author

• Read more about Probation in Kansas Criminalizes Poverty and Continues a Legacy of Systemic Racism

After two weeks of the legislative session, civil liberties remain heavily under attack.  Attacks have come from all angles during week two, from decreasing voting access, to reintroducing abortion bans, to banning gender affirming care for minors. Yet, the ACLU of Kansas remains vigilant in defending the rights of Kansas under the capitol dome. 

VOTING RIGHTS BILLS

Voting right continue to be under attack. The following bills and constitutional amendments have been introduced:. 

• SB4: This bill would eliminate the 3-day mail processing window, disenfranchising Kansas voters. This bill unfairly punishes Kansans for postal service inefficiencies. We are vehemently opposed to this bill and submitted opposition testimony in Senate Federal & State Affairs. 
• SB6: If passed, SB6 would outlaw Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in the state of Kansas. This is an issue best decided at the local level. The ACLU agrees with the overall goal of RCV, to give voters more choices on election day, but has reservations about the impact of RCV on voter turnout in communities of color. The ACLU submitted neutral testimony on this bill. 
• HB2021: A bill that would allow the Secretary of State’s office to dictate where county clerks place ballot drop boxes. No two counties are alike, and clerks know their counties’ needs better than legislators in Topeka. The ACLU is submitting an opponent’s testimony for on this bill. 
• HCR5004: This House Concurrent Resolution attempts to amend the Kansas Constitution to explicitly restrict voting to Kansas citizens. This is an entirely unnecessary addition that would duplicate already existing state and federal law and, as we've seen in other states that have passed similar efforts, this redundancy is a trojan horse serving as a vessel for other voter suppression tactics. The ACLU submitted opposition testimony for to this bill. 

IMMIGRATION BILLS & RESOLUTIONS

• SCR 1602: This non-binding resolution , which encourages Governor Kelly to collaborate with Trump-era deportation policies, was passed out of committee and favorably recommended to the Senate floor. We oppose this measure and will continue to monitor its progress through the legislative process. 
• HB 2020: This bill would require a monthly report of non-citizens who were issued licenses to be sent to the Secretary of State and fails to address issues of data privacy. The ACLU of Kansas submitted opposition testimony to HB2020 in House Elections. 

REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS BILLS

Despite the Kansas Constitution enshrining the right to bodily autonomy, reproductive rights remain the target of several republican legislators. 

• HB 2009 seeks to prohibit all abortions, except when necessary to save the life of the mother.  
• HB 2010 would make it a criminal offense to perform abortions in Kansas.  

Both bills were referred to the House Health and Human Services Committee, but no hearings have been set. We will continue to monitor these bills as the legislative session continues.  

Additionally, HB 2062 was introduced, allowing child support to be collected from the point of conception. This bill would codify “fetal personhood”, granting legal rights to embryos and opening a backdoor to criminalizing pregnant people, and has failed in previous sessions. A scheduled hearing will be held in the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday, January 29th at 3:30 PM.

LGBTQ+ BILLS

Two medical and social gender-affirming care bans for minors were introduced in the House and Senate this during the week.  

SB 63 and HB 2071: These bills will effectively ban access to all medically necessary healthcare (puberty blockers, HRT, etc.)  for trans Kansans under 18 years old, ban state funds, including Medicaid, from being used to cover medically necessary healthcare and prescriptions for trans Kansans under 18, ban state facilities or individuals/entities receiving state funds from “promoting or advocating” social transition or medically necessary health care to trans Kansans under 18, and violate parents’ rights to control the healthcare decisions for their children. These twin pieces of legislation are a direct violation of our civil liberties. Everyone should have the freedom to make their own private medical decisions and consult with their doctors—without politicians’ intrusion. Families and doctors should be trusted to make these private medical decisions, not politicians.  Also, this bill strips parents of their fundamental right to make decisions about their children’s medical care. Bans don’t create more options for care; they take away the only evidence-based option. Hearings have been set for both bills on Tuesday the 28th. SB 63 will be heard at 8:30am in the Senate’s Public Health and Welfare committee, and HB 2071 will be heard at 1:30pm in the House’s Health and Human Services committee. The ACLU of Kansas will testify in person, in opposition, in front of both committees. 

Date

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Show related content

Tweet Text

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Show list numbers

Author

• Read more about Legislative Update: Week 2

The 2024 elections marked a significant turning point in Kansas politics. Under newly drawn district maps designed to consolidate Republican power, the party emerged with a supermajority in both the House (70%) and Senate (78%). This dominance grants Republicans the ability to override any veto by the Democratic governor without significant bipartisan support. Only five Republican legislators in either chamber would need to join Democrats to block legislation. This unparalleled power raises questions about whether Republicans will use this opportunity for bold reforms or repeat past experiments, such as the controversial Brownback tax policies that led to severe fiscal challenges. 

State of the State Highlights 
Governor Laura Kelly delivered her annual State of the State address, urging lawmakers to focus on the long-term impacts of legislation rather than short-term political wins. Her priorities included: 

• Expanding access to child care. 
• Implementing water conservation efforts to combat the drying of Kansas lands. 
• Avoiding unsustainable tax measures, particularly the Republican proposal to eliminate corporate taxes entirely, which she labeled a “nonstarter.” 

In response, Senate President Ty Masterson signaled Republican priorities, including diverting public funds to private schools and advancing legislation targeting transgender students. 

Voting Rights Bills 
Voting rights became a focal point during the first week, with several impactful bills introduced: 

• SB 4: Proposes eliminating the 3-day grace period for advance ballots, which could significantly restrict the time frame for voters to ensure their ballots are counted. 
• HCR 5004: A constitutional amendment requiring voters to be U.S. citizens, at least 18 years old, and residents of the voting area in which they seek to vote. This measure could further restrict voter access in Kansas. 

Immigration Bills and Resolution (SCR 1602) 
Senator Mike Thompson held a last-minute hearing on SCR 1602, which encourages Governor Kelly to collaborate with Trump-era deportation policies. Attorney General Kris Kobach testified in favor, citing data from FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform), a group widely criticized for its ties to white nationalism. FAIR, co-founded by John Tanton, has been labeled a hate group due to its history of collaboration with Holocaust deniers and its promotion of anti-immigrant ideologies. 
Additionally, HB 2020 was introduced, which would require the Division of Vehicles to submit monthly reports listing names and addresses of certain noncitizens issued driver’s licenses du  

Reproductive Rights 
Despite the Kansas Constitution enshrining the right to bodily autonomy, a group of Kansas Republicans introduced two anti-abortion bills in the House of Representatives: 

• One bill seeks to prohibit all abortions, except when necessary to save the life of the mother. 
• The other proposes making it a criminal offense to perform abortions in Kansas. 

Both bills were referred to the House Health and Human Services Committee on Wednesday. While these measures are largely symbolic, as the Kansas Constitution protects the right to abortion within the first 21 weeks of pregnancy, their introduction signals ongoing attempts to restrict reproductive rights. Similar legislation introduced in previous sessions failed to receive a hearing that month. 

Transparency Under Threat 
House Speaker Daniel Hawkins broke a century-long precedent by banning journalists from the House floor on the first day of the session. This move mirrors Senate President Ty Masterson’s 2022 decision to restrict press access in the Senate. These actions align with a concerning national trend of limiting media access and reducing government transparency. 

Upcoming Legislative Priorities 
Republican leadership is expected to focus on tax cuts, even as recently passed cuts have created budgetary challenges. Other contentious topics likely to dominate the session include: 

• Medical Marijuana: Anticipated debates over legalization and regulation. 
• Medicaid Expansion: Renewed efforts to address healthcare access. 
• Abortion Restrictions: Further attempts to limit reproductive rights. 
• Constitutional Amendments: Proposals to increase partisanship in judicial appointments and make voting more restrictive. 

This session will also be compressed, with plans to conclude by early April instead of May, intensifying the legislative process. 

Coalition Updates 

• Debt Free Justice: Advocates are actively seeking testimonies supporting the elimination of juvenile fines and fees. 
• Cannabis Reform Coalition: Optimism grows around introducing a bill to decriminalize marijuana possession. 
• Reimagine Justice Coalition: This group is mobilizing to address pretrial services, bail reform, and juvenile justice issues. The coalition will continue to host bi-weekly Reimagine Justice calls. For more information, contact Lindsay Callendar. 
• LGBTQ Policy and Protection Coalition: Remains vigilant in opposing discriminatory legislation. 
• Reproductive Rights Coalition: Held multiple meetings and will alert the public about any harmful legislation. 

Hearings Scheduled 

• HB 2020: Scheduled for Tuesday, January 21, at 3:30 PM in House Elections. ACLU Kansas will submit opponent testimony. 
• SB 4: Scheduled for Wednesday, January 22, at 10:30 AM in Senate Federal & State Affairs. ACLU Kansas will submit opponent testimony. 
• SCR 1602: A hearing was held on Wednesday, January 15, at 10:30 AM in Senate Federal & State Affairs. 

Date

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Show list numbers

Author

• Read more about Legislative Update: Week 1 (January 13–17)