All Legislation

Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Eliminating Independent Voter Registration Websites

Restricting which websites can accept and transmit voter registration applications.
Status: Governor's veto overridden
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Punishing and Purging Voters for Inactivity

Unnecessarily expanding voter-purge mechanisms.
Status: Governor's veto overridden
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Citizenship on ID's

Requiring citizenship status be listed on driver's licenses.
Status: Won: bill did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Ending Mail-In Voting if Court Strikes Down Signature Verification

Clarifying the signature verification requirements for advance voting ballot envelopes and providing for the repeal of advance voting statutes, except where advance voting is required by federal law, if a state or federal court issues a final order or judgment which is not subject to appeal invalidating such signature verification requirements.
Status: Won: bill did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Reporting Noncitizens Receiving Public Benefits

Requiring certain state agencies to make quarterly reports to the Secretary of State with the names, addresses, dates of birth, and the last four digits of Social Security Numbers of noncitizens receiving public benefits.
Status: Governor's veto overridden
Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Bundled Bill: Expanding Voter Purge Methods and Unsafe Data Sharing

This bill unnecessarily expands voter-purge mechanisms, relies on unreliable data sources, suppresses lawful civic engagement by non-governmental organizations, invites government misuse of personal information, and places unnecessary administrative burdens on state agencies. Database matching has a high error rate and has repeatedly resulted in eligible U.S. citizens being wrongly flagged or removed from the voter rolls. This bill does not address how data would be transferred or how this information would be protected. Compiling a list of already vulnerable residents poses serious threats to their safety. Furthermore, third-party voter registration has long played a crucial role in reaching young voters, first-time voters, rural Kansans, voters with limited internet access, and communities historically underrepresented in the electorate. Voter registration activity is not merely administrative—it is political speech protected by the First Amendment.
Status: Governor's veto overridden
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 24, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Gut and Go: Adding Citizenship Status to Driver's Licenses

This reckless bill, which does nothing to strengthen election security or address any demonstrated vulnerabilities in Kansas elections, would require citizenship status to be listed on Kansas driver’s licenses. This is part of much larger, coordinated attack on civil rights and immigrant communities, raising serious concerns regarding privacy, discrimination, and public safety. Requiring citizenship status to appear on driver’s licenses would expose this personal information to employers, landlords, businesses, law enforcement, and private individuals, all contexts in which a person’s citizenship status is unnecessary. This unnecessary disclosure invites discrimination and profiling and creates a two-tiered system of identification that treats people differently based on immigration status.
Status: Won: bill did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 22, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Bundled Bill: Stipulations of Election Legal Proceedings

This bill includes provisions that threaten to disenfranchise Kansans twice over. First, it relies on signature verification rules known to disenfranchise eligible voters. Second, it threatens to eliminate “no excuse” mail-in voting if courts intervene to protect those voters’ rights. Courts often intervene to address unconstitutional implementation practices, not to attack mail-in voting itself. Rather than fixing the problems with signature verification, this bill takes a far more extreme approach: if courts protect voters and their constitutional right to vote, the legislature will punish them. This is not good-faith policymaking, nor is this a strategy for election integrity. This is a recipe for voter suppression.
Status: Won: bill did not pass
Position: Oppose
Legislation
Apr 03, 2026
rebrand oppose transparent
  • Voting Rights

Compounding Barriers to Ballot Return Assistance

Requiring a person transmitting or delivering a ballot on behalf of another voter to include such person's driver's license number in the written statement on the ballot envelope.
Status: Died on Calendar
Position: Oppose